Back to "The True Unemployment Rate"

AN EARLY ANALYSIS OF OTTAWA'S UNEMPLOYMENT STATISTICS, WITH REFERENCE TO H.R.D.C. OFFICIAL FIGURES COMPARED WITH "OTTTAWA'S HIDDEN WORK FORCE" FIGURES

DATE: April 13th, 2000

By: Robert T. Chisholm B.Sc.Hons.(Eng.) 

 

SOME SALIENT POINTS CONCERNING UNEMPLOYMENT STATISTICS,

TAKEN FROM THE FINAL REPORT OF THE TASK FORCE, "PARTNERS FOR JOBS" (REFERENCE 2):- 

In the fall of 1998, the Ottawa Economic Development Corporation (OED) released its report, Ottawa's Hidden Workforce. The report identified that the real unemployment rate in Ottawa-Carleton is significantly higher than the official unemployment rate when social assistance recipients, discouraged workers and other under-employed workers are factored into the formula. The OED report estimated that there are 145,000 unemployed and under-employed people in this community, some of whom may choose to remain outside the workforce.

(author's note: this is for a total population of about 1.01 million.)

 

LOCAL EMPLOYMENT PROFILE

Table 1 presents information on the local labour force during the period March 1998 - March 1999.

 

Source: Unadjusted Data, Human Resources Development Canada,

Economic Analysis and Information Directorate

FOOTNOTES FROM BOTTOM OF SAME PAGE IN THE REPORT:-

Notes:

· The Labour Force is the population 15 years of age and over who were employed or unemployed.

· The Participation Rate represents the labour force expressed as a percentage of the population 15 years of age

and over.

· The Ottawa Census Metropolitan Area (CMA) includes the Region of Ottawa-Carleton, the Township of

Russell, Cambridge, Clarence and South Gower, Rockland, and Casselman

.

.

.

Ottawa's unemployment rate of 6.3% is one of the lowest in Ontario, is lower than that of Ontario (7.1%) and Canada (8.5%). Ottawa's employment growth is considered to be the strongest in eastern Ontario. The positive employment activity is drawing additional job seekers into the labour market and this has resulted in the official unemployment rate remaining relatively unchanged during the past few months.

 

COMMENTS - SPECIFICALLY RELATING TO THE UNEMPLOYMENT STATISTICS

Based on Table 1 above and from the R.M.O.C. web site, for March 1999 we have:-

For the Ottawa Census Metropolitan Area ("Ottawa C.M.A.") :-

(1) Population 15+                   663,000 - made up as follows:-

(2) Labour Force                      445,200

(3) Not in the Labour force       217,700

The "Labour Force", in turn, was made up of (4) 417,100 who are "Employed" plus a further (5) 28,202 persons who are "Unemployed".

We can probably assume that all those persons aged 15 years or less are either in school, are pre-schoolers or infants.

The population of the Ottawa C.M.A., which includes the whole of the Regional Municipality of Ottawa-Carleton and its 750,000 persons, plus some other municipalities, was estimated at 1,010,498 in 1996; growth at 7.3% over the period 1991 to 1996 would lead to an estimated population increase of about 4% from 1996 to March 1999 i.e. approx. 1,051,000 as at March 1999

As already stated above, in other places in the Final Report we also find:-

In the fall of 1998, the Ottawa Economic Development Corporation (OED) released its report, Ottawa's Hidden Workforce. The report identified that the real unemployment rate in Ottawa-Carleton is significantly higher than the official unemployment rate when social assistance recipients, discouraged workers and other under-employed workers are factored into the formula. The OED report estimated that there are 145,000 unemployed and under-employed people in this community, some of whom may choose to remain outside the workforce.4

 

COMMENTS.

In the Final Report, there is also some information about people using the Ontario Government's "Ontario Works" program, and also some information about the people who use the Employment Resource Centres in Ottawa-Carleton.

But what we are concerned with is to have a clear picture of the true size and character of the overall unemployment problem. This is fundamentally important and critical to knowing how many jobs need to be created, in order to get everyone back to work and contributing to the tax base, and also to determining - at least approximately - what the consequences will be in terms of additional tax revenue to government, when as many persons as possible (aged 15 and over, say) are working. This is also fundamentally important and critical to government's ability in the future to pay for necessary services such as education and health care, and other important things such as reducing personal income taxes.

The 28,200 persons whom H.R.D.C. classifies as "Unemployed" in the Ottawa C.M.A. represent only 6.3% - the so-called "official unemployment rate" - of the "Labour Force" which is 445,200.

But the report, "Ottawa's Hidden Work Force", already referred to, shows quite clearly that the true number of unemployed or under-employed people in Ottawa-Carleton (as at Fall 1998) is 145,000 which equates to 28% of the true labour force.

Obviously some explanation for this huge discrepancy is imperative.

Some things which do not show in the H.R.D.C. figures are:-

1. Not everybody who is classified by H.R.D.C. as "Employed" is in fact employed full-time and some of these part-timers actually want full-time jobs.

2. There is a large number of people classified under H.R.D.C's "Not in the Labour Force" category - most of whom are also, in real terms, unemployed, i.e.:-

(a)        People who are not eligible for federal government E.I. benefits - which are administered and paid by H.R.D.C.. They could be in this position for any one or combination of a number of reasons:-

(i)         E.I. benefits expired, following termination of employment - in real terms, still unemployed (but not recognised as such in H.R.D.C.'s classification system). These people are often labelled as "discouraged workers" or people who have "dropped out of the labour force".

(ii)        Employed but working in "non-insurable" employment either as business owners or as self-employed "independent contractors". This form of employment has some advantages, in terms of expenses which are legally tax-deductible and result in the person paying less personal income tax than would be the case for regular employees. Some people are in a position to do very well, others are simply forced into it because there is no other work available to them. It may also be low-paying and insecure work (painters and decorators, for example). Further, people in this position have no means of paying Employment Insurance contributions voluntarily and so can never establish eligibility for any re-training programs as the means to get better-paying work (or as the means to become bigger contributors to the tax base).

In Canada, unlike the U.S., there are no Professional Employment companies for people to sign up with ( as at April 2000) if they have to work as independent contractors, as a means of being able to pay Employment Insurance contributions and hence establish eligibility for re-training programs plus other Employment Insurance benefits.

(iii)       Never able to get work - by reason of such workplace-related factors factors as "lack of experience" for whatever work they try to get, skills mis-match relative to labour market needs, being perceived as a high risk on account of a long period of unemployment, or some form of bigotry such as that based on age even if the person is mentally and physically fit to work - in real terms, unemployed (but not recognised as such in H.R.D.C.'s classification system). These people are also often labelled as "discouraged workers" or people who have "dropped out of the labour force".

 

(b) People participating in "Ontario Works" training programs as a means of getting back to work. This group gets some financial help from the Ontario government but nowhere near a full-time wage for the work which they are training for (as we would expect) - in real terms, still unemployed (but not recognised as such in H.R.D.C.'s classification system).

(c) People who want to work and who are artificially ineligible from both federal government and Ontario provincial government re-training programs - in real terms, unemployed (but not recognised as such in H.R.D.C.'s classification system). These people are also often labelled as "discouraged workers" or people who have "dropped out of the labour force".

 

(d) Full-time parents - some of whom have access to sufficient or more than sufficient family income relative to needs and wants, so do not want to work at all.

But some of them want to change their situation to add to the family income and so want to work at least part-time. On the other hand, they are still classed by H.R.D.C. as "Not in the Labour Force" as opposed to "Unemployed" and usually cannot access any federal government or Ontario provincial government programs as the means to get work and start to contribute to the tax base.

 

 

CONCLUSIONS

It is clear that H.R.D.C.'s figures (for March 1999, as an example) of only 28,200 persons in the Ottawa C.M.A who were "Unemployed" - with 417,000 "Employed", in a "Labour Force" of 445,200 and 217,700 "Not in the Labour Force" - are totally mis-leading and contain a massive under-statement of the number of people who are unemployed in real terms.

H.R.D.C. -derived figures have been and still are continually causing mis-leading reports to appear in the media, which in turn mis-lead not only the general public but also business leaders and the politicians as to the true size and character of the problem and the numbers of full-time jobs needed to solve it.

The only realistic basis currently available, for knowing the true numbers of unemployed and under-employed in the Ottawa C.M.A., is the report "Ottawa's Hidden Work Force" already referred to. Based on this, the true number of unemployed or under-employed in Ottawa-Carleton is 145,000 persons (in a total population of about 1.1 million), which equates to a true unemployment rate of about 28% of the actual available labour force.

Therefore, the figures in "Ottawa's Hidden Work Force" constitute the only realistic basis for setting targets in terms of jobs needing to be created - for the dual purposes of (a) getting everybody back to work who wants to work and (b) maximising tax revenues to government, as the basis for adequate funding for necessary services as health care and education and as the basis for allowing government to reduce personal income tax rates and other tax rates.

 

 

CLOSURE

The dis-information concerning the unemployment rate for Ottawa-Carleton, represented by the H.R.D.C. figures, is general throughout Canada. The difference in Ottawa-Carleton is that it is the first municipality in Canada to even have an accurate analysis of the true picture, quite apart from actually setting up a plan to deal with it.

Based on the report, "Ottawa's Hidden Work Force", and the fact that the Ottawa C.M.A's population of about 1.01 million represents about one thirtieth of Canada's total population of about 30 million, one could roughly estimate the total number of unemployed in Canada at about 4.35 million persons.

From a recent newspaper article concerning the number of persons contributing to the tax base, ".....some Statistics Canada figures for Canada as a whole refer to 14 million current contributors, but a potential for 21 million contributors." Which suggests, in turn, that the true number of unemployed persons in Canada as a whole is 7 million. Whilst the full picture would only become clear with more information on this point from Statistics Canada, this last-mentioned figure would seem to make sense: Ottawa-Carleton is doing better ecnonomically than almost all other Canadian municipalities - hence any estimate of the total number of unemployed in Canada as a whole, based on the Ottawa C.M.A. sample, is certain to be on the low side.

 

Robert T. Chisholm

Nepean, Ontario

April 13th, 2000

 

REFERENCES

1. "Ottawa's Hidden Work Force". Report released by Ottawa Economic Development Corporation, October 1998

2. Final Report of the Task Force, "Partners for Jobs". Web site:-

http://city.ottawa.on.ca/city_services/finempsupport/pdf/reportSep99.pdf

 

Back to Top of Document